Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

"Legal" concerns about additional lights

  Printable Version
Blazer >> Modifications >> Paint, Body, & Interior >> "Legal" concerns about additional lights Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 10:45:28 PM   
jug

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 10/3/2007
From: PA
Status: offline
I worked at an all night gas station a few years ago and a lot of truckers would hang out an BS. They'd always  say the big rigs you see going down the road decorated with all the unneceissary lights present a problem to the driver because if just one of those lights burnt out, they could get pulled over and fined for it.

I was considering getting a row of orange lights along my roof, just above my windshield when I remembered this. Anyone here have lights like I'm talking about? If so, have you ever gotten in trouble for one being burnt out? It seems rediculous to me, since you usually get nothing more than a warning for a burnt out tail light.


_____________________________

1991 Chevy S10 Blazer 4x4.
4 doors, 4.3L vortec, automatic trans.

Watch my progress in fixing up my Blazer here: From Banger To Beast
Post #: 1
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 11:06:35 PM   
otnietdehoooo



The Chop Shop Moderator
Posts: 1669
Joined: 5/25/2007
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Status: offline
otnietdehoooo's photo gallery
are you talking about the lights that are on the top of like super dutys or like a big dodge 3500? i dont see why they would give you a ticket for that. however i figured those would use leds which, more than likely, will never stop working

_____________________________

Matt - 98 4DR 4WD


(in reply to jug)
Post #: 2
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 11:09:28 PM   
thegr81


Posts: 2639
Joined: 1/16/2007
From: PHOENIX,AZ
Status: offline
thegr81's photo gallery
just check with your local police yes i know not everyone likes them but ask one if you get the chance or your d.o.t. for state regulations just to be on the safe side of the law for extra non factory lighting some states don't allow it unless its factory in your application

_____________________________

2001 2wd 4.3 vortec v6
"I'm not fat, I'm a minitrucker"


(in reply to otnietdehoooo)
Post #: 3
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 11:22:01 PM   
jug

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 10/3/2007
From: PA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: otnietdehoooo

are you talking about the lights that are on the top of like super dutys or like a big dodge 3500? i dont see why they would give you a ticket for that. however i figured those would use leds which, more than likely, will never stop working


Yeah similar to the ones on the Super Duty's. I wouldn;t have any idea if they're LED or not, but if they are and what you explained is the case, that'd be great. I'll be looking further into once I replace my exaust this month.

And gr8t1, not to shoot your suggestion down, but I think if a young long haired mountaineer like myself stopped in the local police barricks to ask them a question like that, they'd laugh me out of the place! Cops around this area are like that. Thanks for the replies guys.


_____________________________

1991 Chevy S10 Blazer 4x4.
4 doors, 4.3L vortec, automatic trans.

Watch my progress in fixing up my Blazer here: From Banger To Beast

(in reply to otnietdehoooo)
Post #: 4
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 11:41:08 PM   
thegr81


Posts: 2639
Joined: 1/16/2007
From: PHOENIX,AZ
Status: offline
thegr81's photo gallery
oh didn't know but you can still call the D.O.T. and find out they wont laugh at you with long hair and being a mountain man my honest opinion is no they arent but then again the D.O.T changes rules all the time

_____________________________

2001 2wd 4.3 vortec v6
"I'm not fat, I'm a minitrucker"


(in reply to jug)
Post #: 5
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 11:54:53 PM   
jug

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 10/3/2007
From: PA
Status: offline
Haha, it's all good man. I'll probably just swing by a local garage and ask them if they'd know anything about that. I was really just curious if anyone had been pulled over for burnt out lights like these, but if they truly never burn out, I won't have anything to worry about. Thanks again.

_____________________________

1991 Chevy S10 Blazer 4x4.
4 doors, 4.3L vortec, automatic trans.

Watch my progress in fixing up my Blazer here: From Banger To Beast

(in reply to thegr81)
Post #: 6
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/22/2007 11:57:08 PM   
thegr81


Posts: 2639
Joined: 1/16/2007
From: PHOENIX,AZ
Status: offline
thegr81's photo gallery
if there led's they last forever so spend a lil extra cash for those and hope to see a picture when you do your mod good luck

_____________________________

2001 2wd 4.3 vortec v6
"I'm not fat, I'm a minitrucker"


(in reply to jug)
Post #: 7
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/23/2007 5:04:55 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 15292
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: online
swartlkk's photo gallery
Roof market lights should be no problem when it comes to local and state regs.  Its when you get into auxilliary driving/fog lights that some state and local regulations get a bit murky.

_____________________________

Kyle-

My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to thegr81)
Post #: 8
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/23/2007 5:39:23 AM   
agent305

 

Posts: 148
Joined: 9/13/2006
Status: offline
agent305's photo gallery
the roof lights, or cab lights, there is like 5 of them?
they are not against the law, well...in massachusetts anyways..
we do them all the time and if you do get them you def should get the led ones they look so much better.
you can even get clear ones with the amber led's if you wanna


_____________________________



12volt installer
00 blazer ls
www.myspace.com/lowblaza

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 9
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/23/2007 12:42:28 PM   
Mr Blazer LT


Posts: 282
Joined: 12/19/2006
Status: offline
Mr Blazer LT's photo gallery
I can't imagine you getting in trouble for a burnt out roof light.  And if the cops laugh at you, then that sounds like they won't pull you over for it.  Even if they did pull you over they will most likely rip up the ticket when you replace it like a brake light or headlamp.

_____________________________

1998 Chevrolet Blazer LT (95% stock)
Pioneer AVH-P7500 DVD receiver
12" Alpine Type-R in a sealed box
PIAA Super Plasmas GT-X bulbs
PIAA Xtreme White bulbs
K & N Drop in Filter


(in reply to agent305)
Post #: 10
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/24/2007 5:01:51 PM   
Idriveachevy


Posts: 909
Joined: 10/9/2007
Status: offline
Idriveachevy's photo gallery
My dads f-350 has the clearance lights on them, he has smoked lenses with amber LED's, they look really good and i wanna do them to my blazer.  Its not a problem if the lights are amber white or red, its colored lights that get you in trouble in CT.

_____________________________

1997 4door 4x4
thrush glasspack
31" bfg mud terrains
2 in. shackle lift and TB crank
Soon to come
- 2 inch body lift.

(in reply to Mr Blazer LT)
Post #: 11
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/24/2007 5:23:52 PM   
blznlowxtreme


Posts: 1471
Joined: 3/20/2007
From: tennessee
Status: offline
blznlowxtreme's photo gallery
i think you will be fine. it is usually the different color lights when you start getting in trouble

_____________________________


2001 blazer xtreme
true bass 8's massive p1500.1 amp
20's wrapped in 245/35r20

(in reply to Idriveachevy)
Post #: 12
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/25/2007 10:53:34 AM   
jug

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 10/3/2007
From: PA
Status: offline
I was planning on putting orange ones on. 

_____________________________

1991 Chevy S10 Blazer 4x4.
4 doors, 4.3L vortec, automatic trans.

Watch my progress in fixing up my Blazer here: From Banger To Beast

(in reply to blznlowxtreme)
Post #: 13
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/25/2007 12:30:32 PM   
rriddle3


Posts: 1550
Joined: 12/22/2006
From: Fort Worth,Texas
Status: offline
rriddle3's photo gallery
Chris, remember that highway rules regarding commercial vehicles can be quite different form the rules for private vehicles. Since orange clearance lights are a factory option on some 3/4 and 1 ton pick-ups they are legal in all 50 states and since they are not considered a visual lighting aid I doubt that a burned out lamp is going to be an issue on private vehicles. Like those lighting strips you can put under your tailgate and hook to the brake lights and turn signals that are exempt from regs.

_____________________________

2002 Blazer LS 4dr 2WD Auto Trans
Hypertech PP III Programmed
Flowmaster 50 Series Delta Flow Muffler, C6 Corvette Exhaust Tip
TYC Elegante carbon fiber tail lights

(in reply to jug)
Post #: 14
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/25/2007 5:04:47 PM   
drperry


Posts: 3926
Joined: 1/12/2007
From: GP AB CA
Status: offline
drperry's photo gallery
As long as the ones facing forward are amber/orange, I doubt you'll ever have an issue with them...

_____________________________


(in reply to rriddle3)
Post #: 15
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/26/2007 7:12:52 PM   
davtak


Site Moderator
Posts: 1466
Joined: 5/1/2006
Status: offline
davtak's photo gallery
quote:

My dads f-350 has the clearance lights on them, he has smoked lenses with amber LED's, they look really good and i wanna do them to my blazer. Its not a problem if the lights are amber white or red, its colored lights that get you in trouble in CT.


What part of CT you from. I'm in plainville. I was looking into doing this too, only along the bottom lip of my front bumper and wire them into the blinkers like the tailgate led bar I have.

_____________________________


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2373050
http://www.myspace.com/davtak



(in reply to drperry)
Post #: 16
RE: "Legal" concerns about additional lights - 10/30/2007 8:21:21 PM   
WolfPack


Posts: 3072
Joined: 10/30/2007
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: online
WolfPack's photo gallery
The problem with the truckers is that they have to have a certain number of clearnance lights in the right locations, so if one burnt out on a truck and it took him below the required number, I could see him getting a citation.  As for the average driver, I imagine clearance lights are up to you to maintain. 

But it's always a safe bet to check with your highway patrol/dot. I researched NC lighting laws when I was putting up auxillary lights and found a few interesting things.  "Legally" I can only use at most 2 if the road is not "sufficiently lit" by street lights, and I have to deflect them or turn em off when a car approaches.  Each state is different, so make sure you check em out.


(in reply to davtak)
Post #: 17
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Blazer Forum >> Modifications >> Paint, Body, & Interior
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk15292
drperry3926
hanr33523
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
wolfpack3072
paddle_grl2952
hillbillyino2887
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.