RE: WAIT4ME TUNE

	Blazer Forum Classifieds Photo Gallery Search Contact BF Sponsors
Blazer News Member List Forum FAQ Timeslips Recalls TSBs Calendars Register Login

RE: WAIT4ME TUNE

Printable Version

Blazer >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Engine & Internal >> RE: WAIT4ME TUNE

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: WAIT4ME TUNE - 7/23/2008 2:40:37 PM

BSchmity69

Posts: 54
Joined: 9/25/2007
Status: offline

just figured i give an update. havmt seen anything under 18mpg in a couple months and iv seen 25 on highway trips and iv smoked a scion tc and a dodge ram with the 4.8

(in reply to 972DRBLAZER)

Post #: 41

RE: WAIT4ME TUNE - 8/14/2008 8:06:18 PM

BlazerSS

Posts: 139
Joined: 3/25/2007
Status: offline

I just thought I would post my results on my Wait4Me tune so my fellow 5-Speeders have questions answered. First off, let me start by saying that immediately after install, I had the crank relearn done. Im using 76 93 Octane with a bottle of Chevron Techron. The truck idles a ton better and overall seems to run a lot smoother! No more occasional vibration at idle. The truck really gets out of 1st & 2nd gears in a hurry, and has a lot more cruising ability at low speeds 35mph+ in 5th. I wasn''t able to go much lower than 40mph with stock ECU. The truck drives a lot better with the Max A/C on as well, doesn''t feel as sluggish while driving with cool clean air anymore. And if that isn''t enough for you, having the annoying ''Shift'' arrow light completely removed was well worth it to me. Overall I am very pleased with my tune so far and am only on my 2nd tank of gas and can''t keep my foot off the pedal. i will update with mpg changes once I can keep my foot & A/C off for a full tank. Let me know if anyone has questions.

_____________________________

2005 Blazer M50 5-Speed 8.5 rear w/3.42 gears
Goodyear Fortera Silent Armor P235/75/R15
w/Schrader nickel valves, stems, & caps
K&N 63 Series w/Drycharger wrap
Magnaflow w/2.5" Mandrel Piping
Wait4Me Tune w/93 Octane

(in reply to BSchmity69)

Post #: 42