Glasspack or flowmaster?

	Blazer Forum Classifieds Photo Gallery Search Contact BF Sponsors
Blazer News Member List Forum FAQ Timeslips Recalls TSBs Calendars Register Login

Glasspack or flowmaster?

Printable Version

Blazer Forums >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust >> Glasspack or flowmaster?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Glasspack or flowmaster? - 2/23/2008 11:45:36 PM

Johnkoch

Posts: 94
Joined: 8/19/2007
Status: offline

Im not sure wich one to get i have dual exahust,and some unknown muffler at the moment,i bought it this way.I wont to make it louder and make it sound better.It also has no catylic converter if that really matters, so which do you think would be better on a 96' 4x4 4 door blazer?

Post #: 1

RE: Glasspack or flowmaster? - 2/24/2008 8:10:44 AM

rriddle3

Posts: 1339
Joined: 12/22/2006
From: Fort Worth,Texas
Status: offline

John, start with the 'related threads' listed below and go from there. There are already dozens of threads on this topic.

_____________________________

2002 Blazer LS 4dr 2WD Auto Trans
Hypertech PP III Programmed
Flowmaster 50 Series Delta Flow Muffler, C6 Corvette Exhaust Tip
TYC Elegante carbon fiber tail lights

(in reply to Johnkoch)

Post #: 2

RE: Glasspack or flowmaster? - 2/24/2008 1:59:26 PM

jimmyboy

Posts: 390
Joined: 9/17/2006
From: southern pines/raleigh, nc
Status: offline

in my opinion glasspacks sound alot better then flowmaster. i would make sure that you have a exhaust pro do it if you want duals beacuse there is no bolt on kit for duals for the 4dr. and second you have the spare tire and gas tank in the way of the exhaust if you do it. the only bolt on catback exhast is the dynomax super turbo which is what i have and it is alittle louder then stock once it gets broken in.

jimmyboy

_____________________________