Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

Cold Air Intake a letdown

  Printable Version
Blazer Forum >> Mechanical & Maintenance >> General Tech Help >> Cold Air Intake a letdown Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 12:12:40 AM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
Today I recieved my ebay cold air intake (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8032576829) and I have to say that it has been a complete letdown...

When I first installed it I thought it was great, it made my engine sound really deep like a V-8 and seemed to have better throttle responsiveness in neutral...

Tonight I just finished testing it with my G-tech and I have to say it was a huge letdown...

Just to give you an idea of what I'm talking about:

Stock G-tech quarter mile times:
17.94 @ 75.6 MPH
17.58 @ 77.4 MPH
17.70 @ 76.9 MPH
17.43 @ 79.6 MPH
17.54 @ 78.6 MPH
Average == 17.64 seconds (+- 0.04 seconds)

G-tech numbers with the new intake:
17.77 @ 77.5 MPH
18.02 @ 76.0 MPH
17.99 @ 76.2 MPH
18.09 @ 76.8 MPH
17.90 @ 77.8 MPH
Average == 17.95 (+- 0.02 seconds)

I have already put the car back to stock and plan to do five more runs again tonight to prove that the new intake was indeed the culprit for my slower numbers tonight... I honestly just could not believe the difference...

On top of the slower times, the engine started making some funny rattling noises that I determined were due to the fact that the intake itself was rattling and made a nasty shaking sound when the car was started... It just didn't feel very solid...

Anyways... I'll post on here if anything changes but as far as I can tell the aftermarket intake did more harm than good...

< Message edited by strongboy2005 -- 2/4/2006 3:31:02 PM >


_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682
Post #: 1
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 12:42:10 AM   
LittleDan911


Posts: 147
Joined: 10/3/2005
Status: offline
LittleDan911's photo gallery
Do You Have A Box Around The Cone Filter.... Cause If Not You Pulling In Some Hot Air.....And All Cold Air... And You Try Re-Instaling That Sensor You Took Out Just To See If That Make A Difference

_____________________________

Pulled All Trim Work & Symbols
20's W/Toyo Proxies 255/45R20's
1500 Watt Fusion 4-Channel Amp
Fusion Door Speakers
In Dash DVD Player

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 2
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 5:03:24 AM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
Didn't get a chance to G-tech it stock again... I'll try to get around to it tomorrow...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to LittleDan911)
Post #: 3
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 9:19:58 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 15304
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: online
swartlkk's photo gallery
Well, first problem I see is that the filter is open to hot engine bay air. If you were to let it cool COMPLETELY down, and make acouple of runs with the new intake, it would give you an idea of what it will be like with the air filter isolated from engine heat. Also, were these times taken on the same day, roughly the same ambient air temp?

Just another question, where is the IAT sensor located in this setup? I just can't see in the pic on the auction where it would go in... Also, is that filter a K&N? If not, get rid of it! Most wanna-be K&Ns filter like garbage and hold up like garbage.

_____________________________

Kyle-

My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 4
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 2:02:33 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
Actually I think I'm gonna just go with an airbox mod. It will give the engine more of a "stock" look (sleeper), and offer better performance than an open-air cone. Are there any "airbox mod" how-tos or anything like that on this site or elsewhere?

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 5
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 2:43:20 PM   
DaveLance


Posts: 51
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
Have you upgraded your exhaust to compensate for the higher airflow?

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 6
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 2:59:08 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaveLance

Have you upgraded your exhaust to compensate for the higher airflow?

No...

But see that's the thing... It wasn't that I was sad that I didn't get any gains, in fact I had expected it to be so miniscule that my quarter mile times would be the same...

But the upgraded intake made the car run WORSE and SLOWER than stock...

So I could understand if there were zero gains that I could blame it on the exhaust, but I actually took a big loss with the new intake...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to DaveLance)
Post #: 7
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 3:13:28 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: swartlkk

Just another question, where is the IAT sensor located in this setup? I just can't see in the pic on the auction where it would go in... Also, is that filter a K&N? If not, get rid of it! Most wanna-be K&Ns filter like garbage and hold up like garbage.

No, it's not a K&N... The IAT sensor goes in a sealed hole in the pipe leading to the throttle body...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 8
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 4:11:23 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: swartlkk

Also, were these times taken on the same day, roughly the same ambient air temp?


Actually it was a little cooler outside last night than when I got my stock numbers. I would've assumed that would've taken my average numbers in a positive direction...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 9
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 4:53:23 PM   
DaveLance


Posts: 51
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
Look at it this way. An intake/exhaust need to balance each other. A stock intake and stock exhaust work properly because they are designed that way. If you increase the amount of air coming in, then you need to increase the amount of exhaust going out. In everyday driving, you may not notice it that much, but since you're running 1/4 miles, you're trying to force the truck to breathe harder and not giving it a way to get rid of the increase in exhaust. You're basically choking the engine.

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 10
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 5:43:40 PM   
swartlkk


Posts: 15304
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: online
swartlkk's photo gallery
DaveLance, that is COMPLETELY false. By putting on a lower restriction intake, you are making the cylinders work less to pull in the air. It's not like the intake is FORCING air into the engine. The engine is one big air pump. Decreasing the restrictions only serves to make the engine more efficient. If you decrease the restriction on the intake, then you may have a higher restriction on the exhaust and then the exhaust would be your limiting factor, but you would still see gains from an intake. True, a better gain can be seen with an exhaust system in place. Typical CAI's net 5-10hp to the crank simply due to the lower restriction and the combination of a good CAI and a lower restriction exhaust (headers & cat) would be upwards of 20-25hp at the crank.

And the "balance" that is in the intake and exhaust really isn't a performance based balance anyway. The intake is tuned to reduce the amount of noise that escapes. The exhaust is tuned for lower emissions and noise. True, they are matched together, but they are done so with concessions along the way. An intake that is designed to cancel out the intake harmonics won't necessarily be the highest flowing intake, the same is true for the exhaust. Gains can be found by simply lowering the restrictions.

Now back to the topic at hand.

strongboy2005, I'm betting that your decrease in 1/4 mile performance is mainly based on the fact that the filter can draw in heated air from the radiator. Fix that and you should see better (or atleast similar) times. Also, although G-Techs are great for showing things like this, they do have quite a bit of variance and that could be making the gap wider between your two scenarios.

_____________________________

Kyle-

My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to DaveLance)
Post #: 11
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/4/2006 8:43:48 PM   
4lowlife



Posts: 1562
Joined: 12/29/2005
Status: offline
4lowlife's photo gallery
quote:

Actually I think I'm gonna just go with an airbox mod. It will give the engine more of a "stock" look (sleeper), and offer better performance than an open-air cone. Are there any "airbox mod" how-tos or anything like that on this site or elsewhere?

I punched holes in the front of the factory air cleaner box. Until I saved enough for the K&N FIPK.

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 12
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/5/2006 2:46:20 AM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 4lowlife

Until I saved enough for the K&N FIPK.

What is that?

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to 4lowlife)
Post #: 13
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/5/2006 2:47:06 PM   
DaveLance


Posts: 51
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
An FIPK is a Fuel Injection Performance Kit. It replaces everything from the throttle body to the filter. See the link.

http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=57-3017-2

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 14
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/5/2006 3:40:04 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaveLance

An FIPK is a Fuel Injection Performance Kit. It replaces everything from the throttle body to the filter. See the link.

http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=57-3017-2

Wow that looks cool...

Where's the best place to buy them?

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to DaveLance)
Post #: 15
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/5/2006 4:05:02 PM   
DaveLance


Posts: 51
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
I would do a general search on the net for blazer performance parts. I don't have one myself. This is what I have on mine.

http://www.airaid.com/200-133_chevy.asp

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 16
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/12/2006 10:38:39 PM   
HCCAFan

 

Posts: 146
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
Yeah I think there is too many variables to determine the gains. You also have to decide whether or not you are willing to take the risk of ingesting some water now. An intake alone usually does little but with some more mods it could make a difference.

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 17
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/13/2006 1:04:56 AM   
black19

 


Posts: 236
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: Novato, CA
Status: offline
black19's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaveLance

An FIPK is a Fuel Injection Performance Kit. It replaces everything from the throttle body to the filter. See the link.

http://www.knfilters.com/search/product.aspx?Prod=57-3017-2


Anyone have one of these installed? I'd like to see what it looks like in the engine to see if it would pass visual inspection...

_____________________________

-1999 Blazer LS 4x4 4Dr Auto-
Audio: Alpine CDA-9856, Eclipse SE8465A 4x6, Eclipse SE8365 6.5's, Kicker Compvr CVR10, Distinct Audio TD402 Amp, SiriusConnect SIR-ALP1

(in reply to DaveLance)
Post #: 18
RE: Cold Air Intake a letdown - 2/13/2006 1:36:10 AM   
4lowlife



Posts: 1562
Joined: 12/29/2005
Status: offline
4lowlife's photo gallery
Sure do click here for picture.



Kidding. Check my gallery here.

(in reply to black19)
Post #: 19
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Blazer >> Mechanical & Maintenance >> General Tech Help
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk15304
drperry3927
hanr33523
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
wolfpack3073
paddle_grl2953
hillbillyino2887
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.