Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

K&N or AEM???

  Printable Version
Blazer Forums >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust >> K&N or AEM??? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
K&N or AEM??? - 2/8/2006 1:33:43 AM   
djbass_mekanik

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 1/17/2006
Status: offline
What Intake Do YOU Think Is Better?? I Am Goin To Get One Of The 2.. Respect To Those W/ Their Stock Or " ebay" Intakes, But I Read Enough Of Them, So Please Dont Post On Them.. Just AEM or K&N...
* i heard that the K&N is better because of the plastic tube.. it absorbs less heat than aluminum or metal intakes, is that true?? thanks

_____________________________

2000 2WD 2 Dr Blazer..
Spintech Side Exit Exhaust
AEM Dryflow Intake
Eclipse, JL Audio, Audiocontrol, Phoenix Gold System
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2202600
Post #: 1
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/8/2006 4:14:28 PM   
RedBlaze


Posts: 181
Joined: 7/29/2005
From: Atlantic, NC (eastside whats crack-a-lackin!)
Status: offline
RedBlaze's photo gallery
I think that they are pretty much about the same. I would go with K&N just because they are more well known. I dont think you would be able to tell a difference either way though.

_____________________________

'00 Chevy Blazer, Red, 2door, 4x4, Auto

(in reply to djbass_mekanik)
Post #: 2
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/8/2006 4:21:34 PM   
4lowlife



Posts: 1562
Joined: 12/29/2005
Status: offline
4lowlife's photo gallery
I installed a K&N because the cleaning kits are easily available. Next time I'm going to try True Flow.

quote:

* i heard that the K&N is better because of the plastic tube.. it absorbs less heat than aluminum or metal intakes, is that true?? thanks

It's depends on the setup. My K&N FIPK gets quite warm under the hood on a hot day.

(in reply to RedBlaze)
Post #: 3
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/9/2006 2:41:04 PM   
Binz316

 


Posts: 158
Joined: 2/3/2006
Status: offline
Binz316's photo gallery
if you go to aem website aempower.com they will so the results on the dyno. i called them personally and they guaranteed there's was better than k&n and other manufacures. take it for what you will, but I bought the brute force and noticed a difference in obvious sound and the passing gear.

< Message edited by Binz316 -- 2/9/2006 2:42:47 PM >


_____________________________

2002 Blazer
2 door 4x4
AEM Brute Force CAI
Kicker coaxials
Alumapro BP-10 /w Cadence A5 Mono Block

2007 Dodge Charger 3.5LHO (My new toy)
mods coming!!!!!

(in reply to djbass_mekanik)
Post #: 4
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/9/2006 3:37:01 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
The AEM boasts a dyno-proven 4 HP more than the K&N FIPK... Is this just marketing or is the AEM that much better than the FIPK?

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to Binz316)
Post #: 5
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/9/2006 4:06:15 PM   
swartlkk


Posts: 15304
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Well, I don't have anything against either of them and am sure that they both will serve you well. Here's my take on the whole thing. The aluminum, having a greater thermal conductivity between the two, will stay cooler to the touch. The problem with that is that it will transmit more heat to the air and the air is effectively cooling it off. Now, does the aluminum intake heat up the air more than a plastic one? Who knows. When you get right down to it, it has to deal with the internal surface area and surface finish to determine how much heat can be transmitted into the air. Just the fact that you are getting away from the accordian tubes and into a smooth walled pipe is a benefit. By switching to silicone couplers and steel/aluminum pipe where the rubber accordian tubes are on the current intake would net gains even with the stock box.

_____________________________

Kyle-

My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 6
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/9/2006 4:32:41 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
But do you think the AEM actually produces more power than the K&N? I can get the K&N for about 150, but the AEM is about 200... But if it's making 4 HP more than the K&N then it would be worth it...

Does the AEM shield the filter from the heat as well as the K&N does?

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 7
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/10/2006 2:16:57 AM   
djbass_mekanik

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 1/17/2006
Status: offline
Well I Think Im Goin With AEM.. But After I Finish My System.. But After Taht I Want To Lower Mine.. U Think I Shud Jus Do Tha Intake Rite Now?? Or Can It Wait??

_____________________________

2000 2WD 2 Dr Blazer..
Spintech Side Exit Exhaust
AEM Dryflow Intake
Eclipse, JL Audio, Audiocontrol, Phoenix Gold System
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2202600

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 8
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/10/2006 11:15:17 AM   
TruckeeT2


Posts: 41
Joined: 2/2/2006
Status: offline
K&N!!!!!

_____________________________

-Jimmy-
94 S-10 Blazer 4.3 CPI 4x4
http://www. myspace.com/firehemi



(in reply to djbass_mekanik)
Post #: 9
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/10/2006 1:03:52 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
I was looking more at both sets and I really think I like the AEM better... They have dry filters (won't mess up mass airflow sensor), as opposed to K&N's oiled filters, plus they claim a higher HP gain (comparing both dynos)...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to TruckeeT2)
Post #: 10
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/13/2006 7:09:35 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
Bought the FIPK on ebay (got a good deal)... So i'll be letting you guys know how it goes...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 11
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/14/2006 7:00:15 PM   
zero psi


Site Moderator
Posts: 1075
Joined: 8/22/2004
From: maynard, MA
Status: offline
zero psi's photo gallery
if you're worried about heat in the intake tube, DEI makes a heat reflective wrap that will fit over the FIPK tube.

_____________________________

01 jimmy, 95 blazer, 01 sonoma, 75 kawasaki kz400, 87 starcraft popup lol!


(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 12
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/15/2006 1:19:19 AM   
djbass_mekanik

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 1/17/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zero psi

if you're worried about heat in the intake tube, DEI makes a heat reflective wrap that will fit over the FIPK tube.


i was thinkin of that... but as i said b4, im goin w/ the AEM.. but not till i finish my system, then lowering...

_____________________________

2000 2WD 2 Dr Blazer..
Spintech Side Exit Exhaust
AEM Dryflow Intake
Eclipse, JL Audio, Audiocontrol, Phoenix Gold System
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2202600

(in reply to zero psi)
Post #: 13
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/15/2006 8:02:33 PM   
strongboy2005

 


Posts: 170
Joined: 1/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zero psi

if you're worried about heat in the intake tube, DEI makes a heat reflective wrap that will fit over the FIPK tube.

Is it really that big of an issue? I thought the issue was actually pulling in hot air... I would think that because the cold air only flows through the piping for a split second it shouldn't really heat up...

_____________________________

2003 LS (4-door) Chevy Blazer 4.3L 2WD GU6 G80
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2257682

(in reply to zero psi)
Post #: 14
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 2/16/2006 10:56:17 AM   
Bgray


Posts: 64
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Bgray's photo gallery
IVe got a FIPK...Works good...gives a sound. Thats about it. Dont expect to get any real results with an intake. Maybe a tiny bit in higher end of the gears(mine did, in my 5 speed blazer). Either would ahve been a good choice, really jsut comes down to preffernce

_____________________________

2005 Blazer. 5 speed..Stock Mommy Mover . Some Crap on it.
Custom comes One cut at a Time, Not in a Box.


(in reply to strongboy2005)
Post #: 15
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 3/11/2006 6:03:12 PM   
2klt


Posts: 156
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Instead of a outside wrap or the like, how about a plastic liner for the aluminum with a thin asbestos separator between the two. A bit elaborate I am sure but the heat transfer would be cut way down thinking with my gray matter anyway.... Course there is probably some reason that it would nt be feasible.
anybody have any thoughts on this. It would be easy enough to set up a proto just to see the basics.

(in reply to Bgray)
Post #: 16
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 3/17/2006 12:22:05 AM   
2001blazer


Posts: 366
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
2001blazer's photo gallery
ok so my friend is tryin to make a cold air intake right now everything is made out of some type of metal/aluminum and w/e else but what about makin one out of pvc it would obviously be light and then just throwing a k&n filter on the end i mean im a k&n guy thats y i say that but do u think this would work...hes makin it for his 96 3 series its a 2 dr

_____________________________

2004 chevrolet silverado 1500 z-71 ext. cab 5.3L V8-Access roll up cover-custom dual exhaust-Bully dog tuner-alpine system-Line of fire-20% tint-Putco Bed rails-goodyear wrangler silent armors-billet grille silver bowtie NEXT-AR wheels-Remote start/alarm

(in reply to 2klt)
Post #: 17
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 3/17/2006 12:32:31 AM   
4lowlife



Posts: 1562
Joined: 12/29/2005
Status: offline
4lowlife's photo gallery
Fo sho! I have this on my Impala. clickety. After it arrived, I realized someone cut up aluminum, bent it up, and threw a few things in it and marketed it.

I had to purchase a 9" K&n cone seperately.

(in reply to 2001blazer)
Post #: 18
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 3/24/2006 5:25:06 PM   
MitchellIannatto

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 3/24/2006
Status: offline
What about the gas mileage?

(in reply to 4lowlife)
Post #: 19
RE: K&N or AEM??? - 3/24/2006 9:25:49 PM   
4lowlife



Posts: 1562
Joined: 12/29/2005
Status: offline
4lowlife's photo gallery
quote:

What about the gas mileage?
18.1 all winter. TB spacer makes the hood bulge upwards.

(in reply to MitchellIannatto)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
Blazer Forums >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk15304
drperry3927
hanr33523
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
wolfpack3074
paddle_grl2953
hillbillyino2887
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.