Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

95 throttle body

  Printable Version
Blazer Forum >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> 95 throttle body Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
95 throttle body - 4/17/2008 4:10:24 PM   
95LS

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
does anyone know if there is a aftermarket throttle body (bigger) that will fit on a 95? ive seen tb spacers but no tb's. what gives ?

_____________________________

found out i have a LT ( couldn''t remember if it was LS or LT when i made this )
Post #: 1
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/17/2008 7:21:42 PM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Considering the fact that the throttle body IS the upper plenum (all one peice), I think you are going to be out of luck with this one...

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to 95LS)
Post #: 2
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/18/2008 8:22:03 PM   
95LS

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
if there is a aftermarket intake i havent found one so ill take it that there is none. i found a JET tb spacer that claims to offer 4-15 ish hp, dynomax exhaust that offers 10-25 ish hp, gibson claims 10-20% in hp gains, edelbrock headers claim up to 1 second off 0-60 times, K&N claims 7.9 hp, voolant clains up to 18 hp, MSD claims 10-20ish hp, then a jet stage 2 chip and thats pretty much all the bolt ons ive seen available for my 95. am i missing anything ?


_____________________________

found out i have a LT ( couldn''t remember if it was LS or LT when i made this )

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 3
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/19/2008 8:33:03 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Link to the Jet TB spacer??  I'd be interested in seeing how they accomplish putting a spacer onto the CPI motor...

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to 95LS)
Post #: 4
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/19/2008 9:07:22 AM   
95LS

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
http://www.performancecenter.com/throttle-body-spacer/jet-powr-flo-throttle-body-spacer

*Combining Consecutive Posts*

i just looked at that site and it says in red right under the picture NOT TBI models. then under the description it says it fits between the stock throttle body and intake manifold. i thought by 95 they got rid of the throttle bodies and they were all cpi motors?


< Message edited by swartlkk -- 4/19/2008 10:01:50 AM >


_____________________________

found out i have a LT ( couldn''t remember if it was LS or LT when i made this )

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 5
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/19/2008 10:00:52 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Yeah, there was no TBI for '95, but the other thing you need to look at is where said spacer would even go...  Last I looked, the throttle body and upper plenum were all one peice.

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to 95LS)
Post #: 6
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/19/2008 11:18:32 AM   
95LS

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
to be honest i havent even looked at mine. but i was under the assumption that it could be replaced or removed because i read on a post here where people take off a piece on the back of the butterfly to make it less restrictive. if it was all one piece how could someone remove the restrictive piece on the butterflies?

_____________________________

found out i have a LT ( couldn''t remember if it was LS or LT when i made this )

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 7
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/19/2008 11:20:12 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
That is on the '96+ SCFI motors.  Not on the CPI motor.

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to 95LS)
Post #: 8
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/19/2008 8:58:37 PM   
95LS

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
i dont see why that site claims that will work on my 95 if the tb is part of the intake then obviously i cant take it apart to put the spacer in there. 

_____________________________

found out i have a LT ( couldn''t remember if it was LS or LT when i made this )

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 9
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/20/2008 3:59:40 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
That's what I'm sayin'!  The picture they show would work on the TBI motor (if they were still around - which for the blazer I do not think they were).

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to 95LS)
Post #: 10
RE: 95 throttle body - 4/20/2008 9:13:40 AM   
95LS

 

Posts: 150
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
ive been lookign at a volant cai and on their website it shows the round top (to fit on the TBI) for a 95. i guess they were still around in 95 ???


_____________________________

found out i have a LT ( couldn''t remember if it was LS or LT when i made this )

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 11
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Blazer >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk14299
drperry3896
hanr33476
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
paddle_grl2942
hillbillyino2884
wolfpack2783
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.