Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

intake mods

  Printable Version
Blazer Forum >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust >> intake mods Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
intake mods - 7/3/2006 2:46:21 AM   
pcvfd12

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
Are there any inexpensive intake mods that can be done to the factory equipment. I want to get a cold air intake but it may be a while. For the time being I may have to settle for a K&N standard filter and setting up the air box to allow more air in. Has anyone done anything like that? Any suggestions are welcome and appreciated. I just purchased the Blazer a few days ago. I'm ready to start doing a few things to it.

2001 2dr S10 Blazer 4.3L Vortec


Any other mod ideas for the vehicle are welcome too!
Post #: 1
RE: intake mods - 7/3/2006 11:11:44 AM   
O_P_PLaya

 

Posts: 18
Joined: 6/30/2006
Status: offline
go for an exhaust. they're not that expensive. u can get an aftermarket muffler and let ur car breathe a lil easier. i have a magnaflow muffler with a chrome tip. i got mine done for about 160, labor and all. if ur lucky u can talk them done too. u could get pulleys for under 100 bucks too. um...jet performance makes a thermostat thats about 15-20 bucks. all other moods that i know of r more expensive. hope that helps.

_____________________________

2000 blazer LS 2WD 4.3L Vortech
Granatelli MASS AIR FLOW SENSOR
AEM BRUTE FORCE INTAKE
MAGNAFLOW SINGLE EXHAUST
CARRIAGE WORKS BILLET GRILLE
JL AMPS & SPEAKERS W/PIONEER DECK
BELLTECH SPINDLES, DJM BLOCKS
17" A.R. TORQUE THRUST IIs

(in reply to pcvfd12)
Post #: 2
RE: intake mods - 7/3/2006 1:52:34 PM   
postal99blazer

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 6/1/2006
Status: offline
postal99blazer's photo gallery
if u still have the stock airbox u can make a bigger hole in it where the air hole is at now or u can descreen the mass air

_____________________________

99 s10 blazer 4x4 4.3l vortec
k&n air filter
magnaflow w/ turndowns
msd coil
taylor 10.4 mm plug wires
have a tuned ecu from WWW.PCMFORLESS.COM

(in reply to O_P_PLaya)
Post #: 3
RE: intake mods - 7/3/2006 2:34:10 PM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: postal99blazer

if u still have the stock airbox u can make a bigger hole in it where the air hole is at now or u can descreen the mass air

Please be aware that removing the screen on a stock MAF sensor can cause more harm than good. Stock MAF sensors are calibrated to be used with the straightening screen installed. This evens out the airflow so that the placement of the sensing elements reads the average. By removing the screen, the flow could be distrubed enough that the MAF reading would not be accurate to a point of damaging other areas in the motor AND transmission.

Also let me say that it has been well documented in the 3800 community that the screen has showed NO measurable decrease/increase in performance installed or uninstalled. Both cases being tested at the track and on a dyno. What was worth noting is an erratic idle and a lean condition that was recorded by the dyno computer. Both issues that were not there on the same vehicle with the screen installed.

Now with a proper cold air intake, a screenless MAF (one designed without a screen) that has a larger throat diameter will obviously flow better. But to ignore the fact that the factory MAF when modified does not equal a properly engineered aftermarket MAF is... Well... You get the point.

This has already gotten more long winded than I intended so I'll leave it be with this. I have had this discussion before and it can be found here:
http://www.blazerforum.com/fb.asp?m=18780
The link above walks through the intake tract showing the relative CSA (cross-sectional area) of the restrictive components. Have a read through it if you have some time. LOL

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to postal99blazer)
Post #: 4
RE: intake mods - 7/3/2006 3:48:02 PM   
boomtruck97


Posts: 544
Joined: 6/23/2006
Status: offline
boomtruck97's photo gallery
for $30 at Autozone you could pick up the Edelbrock 14" air filter that just bolts on and you would remove the box all together. or am i thinking of the older models only? I have a 92 so i dont know about the newer ones.

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 5
RE: intake mods - 7/4/2006 10:24:04 AM   
02 Vortech


Posts: 279
Joined: 12/11/2004
Status: offline
02 Vortech's photo gallery
try something like this for alot cheaper than FIPK or brute force.


http://meticulous-s10.itgo.com/custom3.html

_____________________________


CUSTOM REARMOUNT TURBO BLAZER - 11psi
8.36 @ 83m

(in reply to boomtruck97)
Post #: 6
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 2:37:08 AM   
pcvfd12

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
02 Vortech.....thats really cool. I my have to try that!

< Message edited by pcvfd12 -- 7/8/2006 2:39:25 AM >

(in reply to 02 Vortech)
Post #: 7
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 2:38:17 AM   
pcvfd12

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
Thanks for all the suggestions!!! The weekend is finally here and I'll have some time to do a few things with the blazer. I've only had it a week so its about time I got to do a little tinkering!

(in reply to 02 Vortech)
Post #: 8
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 10:34:39 AM   
jagblazer01


Classifieds & A/V Moderator
Posts: 2207
Joined: 2/23/2006
Status: offline
jagblazer01's photo gallery
hey swart what about running an aftermarket MAF with a CAI. would that help any?

_____________________________


2001 blazer 4wd 4.3L 4 door
Prestigious Innovations
www.prestigiousinnovations.com

(in reply to pcvfd12)
Post #: 9
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 10:51:36 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
So long as the aftermarket manufacturer has setup their MAF frequency range in such a way that the stock PCM knows how much air is going through it, you should be set. Then your restriction is in the TB, exhaust, and cam profiles.

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to jagblazer01)
Post #: 10
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 12:22:45 PM   
Black95

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 11/20/2005
Status: offline
or you could just get something like what is posted in my link. man its always good practice to check ebay first! lol, it may not be a k&n but fo rthe cost i am sure you wouldnt mind. you could always add the k&n filter later and just use the piping from this one


eBay 96-04 S10 Blazer 4.3L CAI

< Message edited by Black95 -- 7/8/2006 5:37:15 PM >

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 11
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 2:06:08 PM   
pcvfd12

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
Looks good.....do you have one? If so how well does it work?

(in reply to Black95)
Post #: 12
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 5:27:36 PM   
Black95

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 11/20/2005
Status: offline
no i do not have one because my truck is a 95 so it wont work with mine. however, if you want to mod your intake to take in more air this will certainly do it. will the filter flow as much as a K&N i am not sure but you are paying a fraction of the cost you would be spending on the K&N. so to me it would be worth it. especially if down the road you want the K&N you could use this piping, like i said. i am sure that the piping i showed you with a K&N will work just as good as the K&N kit that sells for 300 dollars. unless K&N uses some special intake grease to reduce friction inside the intake!

(in reply to Black95)
Post #: 13
RE: intake mods - 7/8/2006 6:13:45 PM   
02 Vortech


Posts: 279
Joined: 12/11/2004
Status: offline
02 Vortech's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: jagblazer01

hey swart what about running an aftermarket MAF with a CAI. would that help any?


AFTERMARKET MAF IS A WASTE OF MONEY- even running 12psi i will still run the stock maf. it flows good enough 2 350hp. and the aftermarket ones are crap.

_____________________________


CUSTOM REARMOUNT TURBO BLAZER - 11psi
8.36 @ 83m

(in reply to jagblazer01)
Post #: 14
RE: intake mods - 7/9/2006 12:57:04 AM   
pcvfd12

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
Black....not sure about the grease but I'm sure the K&N has some form of a seal to help bring in outside air and not engine compartment air. I'm gonna look into this a little more. Thanks!

(in reply to 02 Vortech)
Post #: 15
RE: intake mods - 7/9/2006 12:33:53 PM   
Black95

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 11/20/2005
Status: offline
dude you know the grease thing was a joke right?

(in reply to pcvfd12)
Post #: 16
RE: intake mods - 7/9/2006 1:06:58 PM   
pcvfd12

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
Yeah I kinda thought that but you never know what people will try to tell you about vehicles. I'm not completely up to speed on the technology in the auto world either so I would hate to call someone out and be made to look like a fool. Glad to know you were joking!

(in reply to Black95)
Post #: 17
RE: intake mods - 7/26/2006 8:50:13 PM   
flowmasta


Posts: 302
Joined: 7/21/2006
Status: offline
flowmasta's photo gallery
ight so my brothers telling me that a short ram cold air intake does almost nothing as compared to a cold air intake with the inlet in the valence because the short ram CAI is close to the engine and after the engine warms up the air is heated, and that the valence inlet is the better choice, does he have a point

(in reply to pcvfd12)
Post #: 18
RE: intake mods - 7/26/2006 9:20:12 PM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14299
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Well, right off the bat, if you have a filter open to underhood temp air, that is hurting you more than any increase in flow will help. A true CAI will out perform a filter on the TB in any instance (all external sheet metal installed and unaltered). The colder the air, the more dense, and the more potential to make power.

With my supercharged Bonneville, I can tell the difference between an 70*F day and an 90*F day. There is a remarkable difference. So if 20*F has an impact, imagine the difference between outside temp and underhood temp. Let me give you some #'s. I just took a test drive with my Bravada. The intake duct work was 127*F on the outside (measured via infrared thermometer) with an ambient air temperature of 76*F. HUGE difference and would make for a very noticeable performance difference s/c or n/a.

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to flowmasta)
Post #: 19
RE: intake mods - 7/27/2006 5:02:33 PM   
aris_unlimited

 

Posts: 231
Joined: 3/30/2006
Status: offline
aris_unlimited's photo gallery
Ya know you could always try a Tornado Fuel saver. I know a lot of people say that they don't work but I installed one and actually had some decent luck with it. It did increase mileage a little bit 1-2 mpg. And my blazer does feel a little more powerful now. Plus it added a little bit of a bubbling noise to the exhaust (sounds pretty nice) The only thing I would worry about is making sure that your after market intake has the same size piping as stock or it won't fit in that one. But hey for $70 you actually get some pretty decent results.

_____________________________

Cars: 2000 Chevy Blazer 4.3L 4WD LT, 2004 Nissan 350z 6speed.

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
Blazer >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk14299
drperry3896
hanr33476
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
paddle_grl2942
hillbillyino2884
wolfpack2784
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.