Eating Mustangs
Login  | |
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/14/2007 10:17:26 PM
|
|
|
BlackBlaze
Posts: 132
Joined: 11/7/2006
From: Motor City and Hockytown
Status: offline
|
i dont know about mustangs but a friend of mine has a jeep that will take care of corvettes
he has a 1972 cj5 with a 454
it hasnt been dropped either, it is a roll over waiting to happen
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/15/2007 12:39:51 AM
|
|
|
SDimeBlazerlady
Posts: 484
Joined: 9/9/2006
From: Everett,Wa
Status: offline
|
Well this story isnt bout a Stang but a Maverick my friend thought her Lil 302 Maverick was the .... And my lil Slant 6 was just tooo Slow! Well i raced her 3 different times and beat the 302 This was yrs ago when only cool bolt on was Cherrybomb n flippin the air filter lid over...2 times was from dead stop. both times at least a car ahead.3rd time we was travelin at 55mph on Freeway she went by me thinkin yeah i got Linda this time..HeeHee...I dropped the peddle n my lil 6 came alive and i flew past her lol Ford Mav over 120k miles Plymouth Duster 66k orig. Miles...Sooooooo moral of that story dont talk ..... lol
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/15/2007 11:10:58 PM
|
|
|
DankBlazer
Posts: 203
Joined: 1/16/2007
Status: offline
|
Not to burst your bubble or anything man but that must have been one slow stang, because a 3.8 V6 stang would walk a blazer, and those are really slow. May I ask what year the mustang was?
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/16/2007 5:55:38 AM
|
|
|
zero psi
Site Moderator
Posts: 1075
Joined: 8/22/2004
From: maynard, MA
Status: offline
|
She's not talking about a mustang, but a maverick vs. a duster.
*edit* Nevermind. Didn't realize you were talking about the first post. My bad.
< Message edited by zero psi -- 4/16/2007 7:11:42 AM >
_____________________________
01 jimmy, 95 blazer, 01 sonoma, 75 kawasaki kz400, 87 starcraft popup lol!
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/20/2007 8:58:12 AM
|
|
|
rabbit0102030
Paint & Body Moderator
Posts: 1231
Joined: 9/25/2006
From: GdUp, TEXAS
Status: offline
|
 NO WAY! I'm not buying this story!  What have you been drinking?! LMFAO! Yo lastcoupe can I get a second on the BS call here?! Bad drvier or not you woulda got smoked!
_____________________________
June 2007 Ride Of The Month
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/20/2007 3:57:04 PM
|
|
|
EuroGoldLS
Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
|
Not BS! Im not gonna argue with you but he did smoke me off the line. I caught up to him and passed him.
_____________________________
My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/20/2007 4:33:03 PM
|
|
|
rabbit0102030
Paint & Body Moderator
Posts: 1231
Joined: 9/25/2006
From: GdUp, TEXAS
Status: offline
|
Sorry, but I just don't believe that at all!
_____________________________
June 2007 Ride Of The Month
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/20/2007 10:00:44 PM
|
|
|
lastcoupe
Posts: 1137
Joined: 7/27/2006
Status: offline
|
I can honestly say that I do not like mustangs, compared to their GM counterparts...well they just don't compare, but you have to give credit where it is due, and I don't believe a blazer could take one...even a v6. And just so you know euro......a bigger tire will make your car accelerate slower not faster....it's effectively the same as putting in a higher (numerically lower) gear. It makes your car slower, but it always looks better
_____________________________
 
ASE & GM certified Pro Auto Technician
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/20/2007 10:46:19 PM
|
|
|
EuroGoldLS
Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
|
Maybe he just don't know how to drive...
His Mustang has 180hp on the hand held dyno, my blazer has 215hp on the same dyno. My curb weight was considerably reduced (took out back seats and had only 3 gallons of gas left), but that still should not have made a drastic difference.
I don't know how I beat him, I honestly don't. There was no BS in my story though, I assure you that. I beat him to the end of the blacktop and that was it...
His sister Holly has a stock RX8 (rich family IMO) that I couldn't take on the other day, but thats no surprise b/c it has 250bhp. His older bro has a 2004 Jeep Wrangler, but he never races b/c he is really lazy.
_____________________________
My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/21/2007 12:55:29 PM
|
|
|
blazinloud
Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/8/2006
From: Saskatoon, Canada
Status: offline
|
I coulda smoked some guy in a 4 banger stang........we were doing maybe 80k and i heard him stomp it......only thing is his engine went crazy but he went nowhere........i didnt even bother.......
I think he musta recently bought it and the wow factor of owning mustang was still present.
I had a 83 mustang 3.8 and im sure my jimmy would walk all over it.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/21/2007 4:15:43 PM
|
|
|
EuroGoldLS
Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
|
The early 80's mustangs were the 'forgotten generation' of the mustang i think, and possibly the ugliest ones at that.
_____________________________
My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/21/2007 11:19:19 PM
|
|
|
blazinloud
Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/8/2006
From: Saskatoon, Canada
Status: offline
|
it was free........i aint complaining......
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/22/2007 5:50:06 AM
|
|
|
drperry
Posts: 3901
Joined: 1/12/2007
From: GP AB CA
Status: offline
|
The driver of the 'stang must've really sucked... The Mustang (we still don' know what year it was, do we?) HAD to have been the V6. Even then, at most, it should be a close match, without turns.
V6 'stangs are a pretty big joke, power wise (my old Z34 would pull away from the new style of 'stang with a V6) And that only put 173HP to the ground, according to the G-Tech.
Also, at MOST the Mustang will eigh 3300 - 3400lbs, your Blazer should have at least 300lbs on top of that...
FYI, the new 'stang puts out 210HP and 240ft/lbs of torque.
So, either your friend really sucks at driving, something is broken with his Mustang...
And tires squealling means you're at the PEAK traction of your tires. if they squeal without skidding or spinning, that's a GOOD thing. Don't try and go faster with those tires.
Either way, good kill! Bring a video camera next time! Races are fun to watch!
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Eating Mustangs - 4/27/2007 4:21:34 PM
|
|
|
2001blazer
Posts: 366
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
|
i believe him cuz i have beaten one in my old black blazer. those 99-04 bs mustangs with v-6 are slow. and by the way rx-8 come with 238 hp from the factory with a 6 spd and 197 with the auto it wasnt until this year that the auto recieved a 6 spd auto instead of 4 spd and they upped the hp to 212. trust me my g/f has an 05 rx-8 auto. and also the autos are extremely slow at first you have to have the rpms at 4k plus to get the car going fast i raced a bmw 328is with it and got walked all over until i got into the rpms a little but i have gunned it on the highway and walked away from it at about 60-85
_____________________________
2004 chevrolet silverado 1500 z-71 ext. cab 5.3L V8-Access roll up cover-custom dual exhaust-Bully dog tuner-alpine system-Line of fire-20% tint-Putco Bed rails-goodyear wrangler silent armors-billet grille silver bowtie NEXT-AR wheels-Remote start/alarm
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
