Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

RE: Eating Mustangs

  Printable Version
Blazer Forums >> General >> Street N Strip >> RE: Eating Mustangs Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Eating Mustangs - 6/1/2007 10:25:13 AM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
I think it might have had something to do with corner acceleration, bear in mind this wasn't a drag race, but I accelerated off the corner before he did and I walked right on around him until we both hit our 98 mph limiters (my speedometer is slow by 2mph, so I was really running 100 and he was running 98) 

_____________________________


My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye

(in reply to BLK85)
Post #: 21
RE: Eating Mustangs - 6/6/2007 6:58:03 PM   
2001blazer


Posts: 366
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
2001blazer's photo gallery
not every mustang is fast please take this into consideration everyone. a 1999 v-6 mustang w/ auto runs an 8.6 0-60 and 16.5 1/4 mile time these are not fast times.everyone gets freaked out when they hear mustang o boy it must be fast

_____________________________

2004 chevrolet silverado 1500 z-71 ext. cab 5.3L V8-Access roll up cover-custom dual exhaust-Bully dog tuner-alpine system-Line of fire-20% tint-Putco Bed rails-goodyear wrangler silent armors-billet grille silver bowtie NEXT-AR wheels-Remote start/alarm

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 22
RE: Eating Mustangs - 6/6/2007 8:06:17 PM   
lennyblazer


Posts: 1988
Joined: 5/6/2007
From: Appleton, WI / Houghton, MI
Status: offline
lennyblazer's photo gallery
EuroGold, with all that extra weight in the back with the 4subs and everything to run them it probably evened up the race a little, plus driver skill was probably a big factor in that. I have never raced anything in the Blazer (sucks too much gas, too most likely lose).

I did beat a 5.0L 99-04 vody style Mustang in my 1994 Taurus SHO, but the mustang was stock and I had a K&N dropin filter, and new upgraded MAF sensor and upgraded air intake/throttlebody stuff. (Unfortunately the SHO was a Auto but I was pushing 250hp). He barely beat me off the line but then I caught up in a 1/4 mile run on the street. I loved that car but not quite as much as the Blazer now (offroading and practicality )

-Lenny


_____________________________

-Lenny
4.3L Auto. 3.73Gears

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2358267

(in reply to BLK85)
Post #: 23
RE: Eating Mustangs - 6/10/2007 10:30:04 PM   
02 Vortech


Posts: 279
Joined: 12/11/2004
Status: offline
02 Vortech's photo gallery
v6 mustangs suck.....

on a 75shot with pullies i had a hard time with 2v 4.6 mustangs that where lightly modded.....

i have mustang friends who talk ****.. until i spank them...... but im also turbo'd on drag radials..... and then i have mustang friends who have there own turbo(s) s/c or spray and 500+whp and i just sit down put my tail between my legs.

i can take the new lightly modded GT's.... (I/E/H/T)
and now pretty heavily modded 2v 4.6GT's
and so far i have beaten both mach1's i have run from a dig but from a roll the mach's pull on me a little.

_____________________________


CUSTOM REARMOUNT TURBO BLAZER - 11psi
8.36 @ 83m

(in reply to BLK85)
Post #: 24
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/10/2007 9:42:00 PM   
1finesdime


Posts: 9
Joined: 8/10/2007
Status: offline
im a HUGE fan of the foxy body mustangs and have been come a mustang enthusiast. I have owned a mustang and drivin/ridden in several and watched out at the track mustangs are no laughing matter when put into the right hands. i could see him pulling on a v6 mustang in his blazer hell back when i had my 01 blazer i had upgraded quite a bit on it and could take stock 5.0's all day in 4 low but after the first little they had me as i had no top end worth a ****. anything is possible if you bank account is large enough.


_____________________________

Get out of my way or understand what its like to be gravel caught in my tread

(in reply to 02 Vortech)
Post #: 25
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/11/2007 1:00:56 AM   
*Old_School*

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 6/19/2007
Status: offline
Eurogold, just curious, the little collage thing in your signature says JDM in the center, which stands for Japanese Domestic Market.  So i was just currious why you had it with a pic of your blazer fron and instrament cluster, seeing as blazers would have a USDM, not a JDM.

(in reply to 1finesdime)
Post #: 26
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/11/2007 3:33:41 AM   
drperry


Posts: 3901
Joined: 1/12/2007
From: GP AB CA
Status: offline
drperry's photo gallery
The JDM part most likely refers to his projector headlights...


And as for beating a 5.0 in 4-low... That's practically a given... My old 4 banger Mazda pickup could stomp a stock 5.0 in 4-low... up to 90km/h... You run out of gear long before you run out of torque.

_____________________________


(in reply to *Old_School*)
Post #: 27
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/11/2007 6:47:16 AM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: *Old_School*

Eurogold, just curious, the little collage thing in your signature says JDM in the center, which stands for Japanese Domestic Market.  So i was just currious why you had it with a pic of your blazer fron and instrament cluster, seeing as blazers would have a USDM, not a JDM.

Yes that refers to the headlights, signals, and taillights.  

_____________________________


My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye

(in reply to *Old_School*)
Post #: 28
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/11/2007 10:49:13 AM   
02 Vortech


Posts: 279
Joined: 12/11/2004
Status: offline
02 Vortech's photo gallery
im sorry man i cant take you seriously.....

was it a v6 mustang first off?

and wtf is a handheld dyno.... if your talking about a gtech...... or any dyno for that matter of fact they are worthless IMO. dyno's say that my turbo truck only puts down 255whp.... and yet i can go run down 300whp camaro's that weigh less and have better aerodynamics...... dyno's are good for tuning, and dyno queens thats about it...
Kinda hard to run a 7.7 1/8th mile in a blazer with only 255whp...... because i did run a 7.7 and you'd need a little more power then that.

and why do you have "JDM" parts on a fricken blazer......... go buy a honda honestly.

sorry im a little sour about this but every s10, blazer, sonoma, forum on the internet almost all of them ahve no idea about racing. so funny to see the first time most of you/them go to the track and see street driven 4 cyl's running consistant 9's, 10', 11's..... just cause you got a v6 or 4.3L's it doesnt mean ****. i got destroyed bye my friends cam'd & full bolt on evo last night. wasnt even a race....... blazers are quick for a school bus i guess, but your not going to go out and beat a quality mustang stock for stock (v8 mustang that is).  

Im going to be building a foxbody one of these days. im going to make my own turbo kit for under $1000 and run 11's.... thats the goal not hard. the 5.0 may not be a beast from teh factory but it can hold alot of power and not break (under 500whp that is)


and commmon...... jdm..... blazer....... i just smashed my head into my desk.

< Message edited by 02 Vortech -- 8/11/2007 11:00:39 AM >


_____________________________


CUSTOM REARMOUNT TURBO BLAZER - 11psi
8.36 @ 83m

(in reply to BLK85)
Post #: 29
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/13/2007 9:08:51 AM   
offroaddude77

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
offroaddude77's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: 02 Vortech

im sorry man i cant take you seriously.....

and commmon...... jdm..... blazer....... i just smashed my head into my desk.


X2

(in reply to 02 Vortech)
Post #: 30
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/13/2007 9:40:15 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14472
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
I don't see how having something made by JDM makes any difference.  I like the looks of Euro's lights better than the stockers...  As if the use of such a product makes his opinions or experiences of any lesser value than your own...  Please...  Most of the parts on these trucks are made in China anyhow...

Back to discussing the ACTUAL topic of this thread...

< Message edited by swartlkk -- 8/13/2007 9:44:33 AM >


_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to offroaddude77)
Post #: 31
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/13/2007 10:16:51 AM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
Thanks Kyle. 

Anyway, 02 Vortech,  I didn't make the signature anyway. TripleBlackBlazer made it. I would brag about having JDM by putting it in my signature, I just thought it was common courtesy to put up the signature for a while so as to be polite.
The "handheld dyno" thing was something the guy plugged in to the OBD port, and it gave a reading of what power the engine was producing between idle and 5100 RPMs... whether its accurate, I'm not sure. 



OK.   yes thats a V6 Mustang 01 model with 19" rims, fully equipped with a Clarion system with two 15s in the trunk, two twelves in the back footspace. No performance mods at all. Driver is fat.
I was running my Blazer with the Flowmaster exhaust, 11.5 inch intake with duct and scoop. Less than 1/4 tank of 93 octane ethanol.

The point of the dicussion is that I beat the guy's Mustang, not whether or not its possible to beat the Mustang. ALSO, why would I lie about this?

Clearly what gave me the edge was that I had a lot more skill behind the wheel than my opponent, not that my Blazer was any quicker than the Mustang.

_____________________________


My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 32
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/13/2007 11:42:58 AM   
drperry


Posts: 3901
Joined: 1/12/2007
From: GP AB CA
Status: offline
drperry's photo gallery
Gyar, it don't be mattering what the opponent be driving, if he's a bad driver, ye can beat him in pretty much any vehicle!

_____________________________


(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 33
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/14/2007 7:57:24 AM   
sasquatchfound


Posts: 185
Joined: 5/28/2007
Status: offline
Although i agree stang's are fast cars, i think we give them way to much credit. I have seen many the last 10 years more foriegn than domestic that would walk away from any stang. Granted blazers are not fzast per say but most stangs that i have seen at a lube center  i worked part-time at toped out at 85 mph blazers top out at 100 mph blazers do 14.2 in the 1/4 mile stock stangs do 16.5. The stang will always beat a blazer off the line but in distance the blazer would win out unless the stang is the boss, or the saleen. Now i'm only refering to the v-6's not the v-8's. My first car was a 69' rs 427 camaro with all the goodies and i would race it at great lakes drag way and i found alot of the serious racers with stangs didn't even have ford engines in them. And yes it does depend on the driver. Not that i;m saying it will happen in every case. I know a guy with a 87' lx stang that would race people all the time for pink's and he would tell you "you will see my stang for 8 seconds" and then he would put it back in the trailor and collect your pink slip. Till this day no one knows what he had in it but it was fast as hell. This is just all my opinion though.

_____________________________

any donor can be a father, but it takes a man to be a daddy.

(in reply to drperry)
Post #: 34
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/14/2007 8:12:49 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14472
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Um...  14.2sec 1/4mi Blazer...  Something doesn't sound right...

_____________________________

Kyle-

2004 Rainier
1970 Chevelle - Resto
1974 K5 Blazer - Resto

(in reply to sasquatchfound)
Post #: 35
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/14/2007 8:51:27 AM   
rriddle3


Posts: 1324
Joined: 12/22/2006
From: Fort Worth,Texas
Status: offline
rriddle3's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: swartlkk

Um...  14.2sec 1/4mi Blazer...  Something doesn't sound right...

Has anyone seen my missing 2.75 seconds? I seem to have dropped it.

_____________________________

2002 Blazer LS 4dr 2WD Auto Trans
Hypertech PP III Programmed
Flowmaster 50 Series Delta Flow Muffler, C6 Corvette Exhaust Tip
TYC Elegante carbon fiber tail lights

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 36
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/14/2007 11:33:26 AM   
*Old_School*

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 6/19/2007
Status: offline
Hey, sorry to start a bash, i was just currious.  So there is a company called JDM, it doesnt just stand for japanese domestig market?  Anyway, on the topic of this thread, yes drivers make a huge difference.  Did anyone watch the show bullrun?  A F-150 beat a lamborgini in a slalom drag combo event without any handicaps.  How?  The lamborgini's driver sucked and spun his car out, making him take much longer than a truck.

(in reply to rriddle3)
Post #: 37
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/14/2007 12:03:18 PM   
offroaddude77

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
offroaddude77's photo gallery
hey not tryin to bash you man its just i've raced alot of v6 mustangs and with my tune and other stuff i barely pull on one.  i mean if he was a bad driver then so be it. but if he was just a little bit of a decent driver he would have walked on you all day long. thats all

-my blazer ran 15.69 last year with lots of mods- and to be honest its not really worth it anymore if you want to go fast save your pennies and nickels and buy something else-

and for the 14.2 second blazer, umm its possible with allllooootttt of mods and lots of spray, but def. not worth it.

(in reply to *Old_School*)
Post #: 38
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/14/2007 12:27:18 PM   
drperry


Posts: 3901
Joined: 1/12/2007
From: GP AB CA
Status: offline
drperry's photo gallery
A turbo running 8lbs or so of boost, would probably bump the Blazer into the 14s...

And somehow, I don't see the v6 mustang topping out at 85MPH... My old Lumina was governed at 124MPH... And had plenty more to go, lol. The 'stang is way more aerodynamic than a Blazer, even if it had a little less power, it should still go faster... If the v6 'stang is governed at 85MPH.... Then it's the first vehicle I've heard of that's capped at less than 98MPH

_____________________________


(in reply to offroaddude77)
Post #: 39
RE: Eating Mustangs - 8/16/2007 7:12:43 PM   
2001blazer


Posts: 366
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
2001blazer's photo gallery
v6 mustangs run about a 16.5 1/4 mi THEY ARE NOT FAST. get over it he beat the mustang so have i. v6 mustangs that are stock are some of the slowest cars i have been in.

_____________________________

2004 chevrolet silverado 1500 z-71 ext. cab 5.3L V8-Access roll up cover-custom dual exhaust-Bully dog tuner-alpine system-Line of fire-20% tint-Putco Bed rails-goodyear wrangler silent armors-billet grille silver bowtie NEXT-AR wheels-Remote start/alarm

(in reply to drperry)
Post #: 40
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

 
Blazer Forums >> General >> Street N Strip
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk14472
drperry3901
hanr33479
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
paddle_grl2944
hillbillyino2884
wolfpack2823
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.