Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow

  Printable Version
Blazer Forum >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust >> Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/22/2007 10:31:05 PM   
*Old_School*

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 6/19/2007
Status: offline
Which is better?  And BTW, I heard that Flowmaster lost their patent and that now knock offs will be being made by everyone, including magnaflow, with the same sound and preformance of flowmaster.  Anyone else heard that?
Post #: 1
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/23/2007 9:18:14 AM   
otnietdehoooo



The Chop Shop Moderator
Posts: 1627
Joined: 5/25/2007
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Status: offline
otnietdehoooo's photo gallery
I just got a Magnaflow and I think it sounds pretty nice. I haven't listened to a blazer with Flowmaster (other than clips on the internet) so I don't what they would actually sound like.

(in reply to *Old_School*)
Post #: 2
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/25/2007 5:19:59 AM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
My Blazer has a flowmaster 40. It sounds good but I want it louder. I think I may grab me a new 44 and stick it on later in the summer. I have heard good things about Magnaflow, but they have a different peak sound point than flowmaster. 

Flowmaster has not lost the patent on the deltaflow design, however they did sell their patented resonater and glasspack designs that they were developing early this year... I think Summit or Dynomax may have picked it up though, which are both good muffler companies.

_____________________________


My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye

(in reply to otnietdehoooo)
Post #: 3
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/25/2007 8:38:48 AM   
Jigg


Posts: 494
Joined: 12/1/2006
Status: offline
Jigg's photo gallery
I've had an FM40 with a catco high flow cat and 2.25" piping, and i JUST had a Magnaflow 18" Muffler with a Magnaflow high flow cat and 2.5" piping put on my truck.

Magnaflow has a MUCH better sound than the flowmaster.  The flowmaster was louder, but it was raspy and sounded like crap (IMO).  The Magnaflow is also stainless and comes with a lifetime warranty.

I'll post a sound clip tonight, i literally just had it installed this morning.

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 4
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/25/2007 9:33:27 AM   
FFJustin99Chevy


Posts: 381
Joined: 2/25/2007
From: Harrisburg, PA
Status: offline
FFJustin99Chevy's photo gallery
I realize that this is a Flowmaster versus Magnaflow competition here, but I'd like to do a little advertising for Dynomax.  I have a Dynomax Super Turbo system and love it.  It has a great mellow sound at low RPMs and the 2.5" piping really allows the motor to breathe when you get on it.  The best part about it is that it won't cost a fortune like most of the Flowmaster and Magnaflow systems.  You can pick up everything you need to bolt right up to the cat's 3-bolt flange for $160 (muffler, pipes, hangers).

_____________________________

Bustin Mine 2 Save Yours!


(in reply to Jigg)
Post #: 5
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/25/2007 4:17:03 PM   
RCars2


Posts: 896
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Wisconsin originally but now im in Phx, AZ
Status: offline
RCars2's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: EuroGoldLS

My Blazer has a flowmaster 40. It sounds good but I want it louder. I think I may grab me a new 44 and stick it on later in the summer.


HEH, i got a 40 too and i agree, its loud but should be louder  I gotta say though i really like the throatyness of the flowmaster's vs the magnaflo's. Just personal preference i guess but ive heard both side by side (my blazer vs another at an offroad meet) and i still stand by my 40 series (plus mine was louder).


Edit: For reference this is what Dale sounds like Clicky

< Message edited by RCars2 -- 6/25/2007 4:39:08 PM >


_____________________________

-Rob
"what fell off of where!?!?!"



Repair List:
Fender Rubbing Issue
Fuel Pump
Alignment
T-Case <--Fixed Finally

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 6
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/25/2007 4:24:23 PM   
lastcoupe


Posts: 1137
Joined: 7/27/2006
Status: offline
lastcoupe's photo gallery
About 5 years ago I had a Magnaflow installed on my tuned-port injected Trans Am, and I loved it, but every time I heard a Flowmaster I kicked myself in the ass for just jumping on a Magnaflow.  The next time I bought a muffler, it was 2-super 40 Flowmasters, and I have never bought another brand since.  My Blazer has a super 40 and it's plenty loud for a daily driver, and the performance increase was at least noticeable.  IMO, Flowmaster should have a pattent on their SOUND, it's awesome. 

_____________________________



ASE & GM certified Pro Auto Technician

(in reply to RCars2)
Post #: 7
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/29/2007 6:05:44 AM   
BLK85

 

Posts: 900
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline
BLK85's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: lastcoupe

About 5 years ago I had a Magnaflow installed on my tuned-port injected Trans Am, and I loved it, but every time I heard a Flowmaster I kicked myself in the ass for just jumping on a Magnaflow.  The next time I bought a muffler, it was 2-super 40 Flowmasters, and I have never bought another brand since.  My Blazer has a super 40 and it's plenty loud for a daily driver, and the performance increase was at least noticeable.  IMO, Flowmaster should have a pattent on their SOUND, it's awesome. 

I dont know if it is the same on the TPIs but I know it has been dyno proven on the LS1s (maybe LT1s too cant confirm that) that the Flowmaster actually gives you less power than stock exhaust.  That is a reason why I am hesitent to go with Flowmaster, it makes me wonder if FM is just to around to make sound and not power.   

Im sure everyone is going to get on here saying "I noticed a huge difference over stock with my FM:" but I dont care.  A butt dyno means nothing to me.  Show me a dyno graph or timeslips and I will make up my mind then. 


_____________________________

1999 Blazer 4x4 4 door
1998 Pontiac Firebird Formula-12.36@112mph
2007 Yamaha TTR230



(in reply to lastcoupe)
Post #: 8
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/29/2007 6:09:23 AM   
TheBrettster


Posts: 1082
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline
TheBrettster's photo gallery
Euro just cut off the pipe after the flowmaster, it will be plenty loud, loud enough to set off car alarms. Trust me i did :P

_____________________________


AAZK 4Lyphe

(in reply to BLK85)
Post #: 9
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/29/2007 9:42:02 AM   
*Old_School*

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 6/19/2007
Status: offline
power is not a issue for me with my blazer.  Thats what the nova is for :)

(in reply to TheBrettster)
Post #: 10
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 6/29/2007 11:04:22 AM   
RCars2


Posts: 896
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Wisconsin originally but now im in Phx, AZ
Status: offline
RCars2's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: BLK85

I dont know if it is the same on the TPIs but I know it has been dyno proven on the LS1s (maybe LT1s too cant confirm that) that the Flowmaster actually gives you less power than stock exhaust.  That is a reason why I am hesitent to go with Flowmaster, it makes me wonder if FM is just to around to make sound and not power.   

Im sure everyone is going to get on here saying "I noticed a huge difference over stock with my FM:" but I dont care.  A butt dyno means nothing to me.  Show me a dyno graph or timeslips and I will make up my mind then. 



I cant speak to power increase but I'm finding about 1-2mpg more at the pump vs my stock exhaust. If you have seen whats under most of the blazers stock its any wonder how they move any exhaust gasses. My tail pipe looked like it was beat with a hammer to get over the rear axle and I'm pretty sure the outlet pipe was smaller than the inlet pipe. At any rate thats just what I've found.

_____________________________

-Rob
"what fell off of where!?!?!"



Repair List:
Fender Rubbing Issue
Fuel Pump
Alignment
T-Case <--Fixed Finally

(in reply to BLK85)
Post #: 11
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 7/31/2007 10:18:34 PM   
blazinloud


Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/8/2006
From: Saskatoon, Canada
Status: offline
Lmao!......beat with a hammer......funny....

_____________________________



(in reply to RCars2)
Post #: 12
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/1/2007 5:13:56 AM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheBrettster

Euro just cut off the pipe after the flowmaster, it will be plenty loud, loud enough to set off car alarms. Trust me i did :P

If I do anything else, I'm gonna go strait pipe with resonator only.  That will be loud enough for me. : )

_____________________________


My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye

(in reply to TheBrettster)
Post #: 13
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/1/2007 7:17:10 AM   
Jigg


Posts: 494
Joined: 12/1/2006
Status: offline
Jigg's photo gallery
FWIW, the Magnaflow isn't a baffled muffler, you can actually see right through it.

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 14
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/2/2007 5:42:43 AM   
DetroitMuscle


Posts: 829
Joined: 2/22/2006
Status: offline
DetroitMuscle's photo gallery
Get a dynomax bullet.  A Flowmaster works if you believe it does, and magnaflow actually helps  but you can get the bullet for 35 bucks all day long brand new and it flows better then most.

(in reply to Jigg)
Post #: 15
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/2/2007 5:12:24 PM   
blazinloud


Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/8/2006
From: Saskatoon, Canada
Status: offline
too bad the main restriction isnt the muffler, i dont think you get any gains from replacing the muffler alone, other than sound.

_____________________________



(in reply to DetroitMuscle)
Post #: 16
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/3/2007 5:41:44 AM   
DetroitMuscle


Posts: 829
Joined: 2/22/2006
Status: offline
DetroitMuscle's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: blazinloud

too bad the main restriction isnt the muffler, i dont think you get any gains from replacing the muffler alone, other than sound.


The main restriction on a 2nd gen is the size or should I say lack of size of the manifolds and front pipes. As long as a cat is in good working order it will produce the back pressure needed not to burn up the valves. The Muffler has a big part in the flow as well as the sound. If they didnt have anything to do with flow then every muffler would be the same.( not to mention dyno testing of the muffler with different engine combo's)

On a stock vehicle the main reason for a muffler change is the sound but put some power in front of that muffler then you have to change it to accomidate the flow of air/fuel and spent gases that are in the engine.

(in reply to blazinloud)
Post #: 17
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/3/2007 11:54:57 AM   
a_tack


Suspension Tech Moderator
Posts: 1287
Joined: 4/5/2006
From: Ashland, Kentucky
Status: offline
a_tack's photo gallery
and so it is written, the epic battle between flowmaster and magnaflow shall take place here, on blazerforum.com!!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_____________________________

-Aaron

"Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath." -James 1:19

(in reply to DetroitMuscle)
Post #: 18
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/3/2007 11:04:31 PM   
stevelknievel


Posts: 179
Joined: 3/17/2007
From: Mi
Status: offline
stevelknievel's photo gallery
i have a 40 series on my jimmy right after the cat and at the moment its just dumped right out of the muffler and its loud enough for me to set some car alarms off in subs when i get on it. my buddy has a magnaflow setup on his fox body and it doesn't seem to be as raspy as the flowmasters but it's definitely not as loud. and i had a bullet on my old chevy and that thing was ungodly loud

_____________________________

Trail Rig:
89 XJ
2" Lift
31" General Grabbers
Tow Rig:
97 Jimmy SLT
T-Bar Crank
Superlift AAL
Custom Dynomax Catback
Coated Rockers
Debadged And Destriped

(in reply to a_tack)
Post #: 19
RE: Flowmaster Vs. Magnaflow - 8/7/2007 5:06:05 AM   
FirehawkNS


Posts: 423
Joined: 8/6/2007
From: Charlotte, NC (Lucia)
Status: offline
FirehawkNS's photo gallery
I would stick with Magnaflow or Dynomax.  I had a dynomax system on my 94 V6 camaro and it sounded better then any other v6 anyone had heard (according to others besides myself) and had decent get up and go from the install.  I have installed a few Magnaflows on camaro's and Mustang's and have always loved there sound and performance.  When I got my Z it had flowbastards on it.  I installed most my mods from motor going back to the flows and never was happy with the gains.  I finally took the flows off and installed a Corsa system and pulled it straight onto the dyno and gained 30hp before tune.  I didn't like flows before that, I hated them afterwards!  Now I'm new to the blazer so all things are not equal, but again I plan to run either dynomax or magnaflows. 

_____________________________

2001 Blazer LT, 1999 Camaro Z28, 2004 Acura RSX

www.pewterz28.com
Flickr.com

(in reply to stevelknievel)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
Blazer >> Modifications >> Performance & Brainstorming >> Headers, Intake, & Exhaust
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk14530
drperry3901
hanr33482
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
paddle_grl2944
hillbillyino2885
wolfpack2844
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.