Blazer Forum Blazer Forum  
Chevy Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Forums
Chevrolet Blazer Blazer Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Search   Contact BF   Sponsors
  Blazer News   Member List   Forum FAQ   Timeslips   Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

MT or AT

  Printable Version
Blazer Forum >> Modifications >> Tires and Wheels >> MT or AT Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
MT or AT - 7/16/2007 6:18:24 AM   
sky96744


Posts: 38
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
sky96744's photo gallery
I cant decide to put MT or AT on my Blazer. I like the looks of the MT's but I dont know how they are in the Snow? Anyone have Experience with MT in the snow?
Post #: 1
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 6:21:33 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14499
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Why is this in Sights & Sounds?? 

*Moving to Tires & Wheels*

Do you have a specific brand/model of tire in mind?


_____________________________

Kyle-

04 Rainier
My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to sky96744)
Post #: 2
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 7:10:55 AM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 3121
Joined: 2/9/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: offline
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
Mudd terrains are probably better because they usually have a more aggressive tread.

_____________________________


My theory is that every disrict in the USA tries to send their lying scumbags to either prison or Washington D.C. -rivereye

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 3
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 7:18:30 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14499
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
While MTs may have a more aggressive tread that is self cleaning, most do not have the siping that ATs have.  That and MTs usually have much larger tread blocks which would hurt them on snow/ice.

But I really need to know what tires you are looking at to be able to comment further than the generalizations I have stated above.


_____________________________

Kyle-

04 Rainier
My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 4
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 7:35:24 AM   
sky96744


Posts: 38
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
sky96744's photo gallery
Im looking at the BFG MT or BFG AT

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 5
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 7:44:15 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14499
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
BFG MT:


BFG AT:


My next question would be, what do you do with this truck?  If you go off the pavement only casually, the MTs won't offer any real advantage over the ATs. 

How long would you like them to last?  The MTs are known to wear away quite fast when used mainly on-road.  Not to mention that they mostlikely will be noisier than the ATs.


_____________________________

Kyle-

04 Rainier
My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to sky96744)
Post #: 6
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 7:49:28 AM   
sky96744


Posts: 38
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
sky96744's photo gallery
Mainly for road. Like the look of the MT over the AT. Not too worried about the wear. more worried about the traction in the snow / rain.

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 7
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 8:05:29 AM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14499
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
Here's the tire ratings from Tirerack.com:

BFG AT T/A KO
BFG MT T/A KM

Kinda goes in favor of the MTs for deep snow, but the ATs beat it in almost everything else on the list....  If it were me and I had to choose between those two tires, I wouldn't even think about the MTs unless I was really into offroading.

< Message edited by swartlkk -- 7/16/2007 8:17:01 AM >


_____________________________

Kyle-

04 Rainier
My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to sky96744)
Post #: 8
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 10:22:01 AM   
FFJustin99Chevy


Posts: 381
Joined: 2/25/2007
From: Harrisburg, PA
Status: offline
FFJustin99Chevy's photo gallery
Keep in mind how they are going to fit under your truck depending on what tire size you are looking at.  I don't know if you are planning on mounting them on a stock-height Blazer but you may have an issue with rubbing due to the tread patterns on both of those tires.  I know that even the AT's rub if you get them in a 31" and that's going to kill your tires even quicker.

_____________________________

Bustin Mine 2 Save Yours!


(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 9
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 10:33:26 AM   
RCars2


Posts: 896
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Wisconsin originally but now im in Phx, AZ
Status: offline
RCars2's photo gallery
I've used both and for what you need the AT's are just fine. Despite first glance at images, they look really nice on a blazer (and i would know). As for rain traction you are definatly going to want the AT's. The MT's dont shed water for anything and just slip and slide. Dont even get me started on wet braking with those. As for snow, if its the deep stuff, oh yeah these are gonna rock your world but at the same time the AT's do really well on snow and on ice.

Basically there is a reson they name the tires the way they do. All terrains are good on all terrain in most situations because they carry the features of a road tire with an aggressive tread for hazards. Mudd terrains are good for mudd, deep snow, and rock crawling because of their ability to hook large edges on deep lugs.

Now if you want an ultimate compromise then you end up in my situation. Im getting a set of MT's for off-roading, mudding, and show (because they do indeed look nice) and then for general use im going to keep a set of AT's.

In the end its your decision as to what you want to do but keep these things in mind.

_____________________________

-Rob
"what fell off of where!?!?!"



Repair List:
Fender Rubbing Issue
Fuel Pump
Alignment
T-Case <--Fixed Finally

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 10
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 4:09:32 PM   
blznlowxtreme


Posts: 1450
Joined: 3/20/2007
From: tennessee
Status: offline
blznlowxtreme's photo gallery
i had really great results in snow and  ice with a dunlop radial rover a/t, they didnt look like they would be but i loved them, but if you are set on the bfg, i also liked the bfg a/t but never really used them in the snow, 

_____________________________


2001 blazer xtreme
true bass 8's massive p1500.1 amp
20's wrapped in 245/35r20

(in reply to RCars2)
Post #: 11
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 7:35:54 PM   
swartlkk


Posts: 14499
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Waterloo, NY
Status: offline
swartlkk's photo gallery
I loved Dunlop Radial Rover A/Ts on my old Ram.  That thing went through everything that I tossed at it which included muddy feilds with fully loaded hay wagons behind it.

_____________________________

Kyle-

04 Rainier
My Restoration Projects
Please Do Not PM for Tech Help

(in reply to blznlowxtreme)
Post #: 12
RE: MT or AT - 7/16/2007 10:05:40 PM   
a_tack


Suspension Tech Moderator
Posts: 1287
Joined: 4/5/2006
From: Ashland, Kentucky
Status: offline
a_tack's photo gallery
get the AT's, especially if you will be mostly on-road.... you wont be disappointed..

_____________________________

-Aaron

"Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath." -James 1:19

(in reply to swartlkk)
Post #: 13
RE: MT or AT - 7/18/2007 1:41:38 PM   
sky96744


Posts: 38
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
sky96744's photo gallery
I was also looking at the Goodyear Wrangler MTR's

(in reply to a_tack)
Post #: 14
RE: MT or AT - 7/18/2007 2:37:33 PM   
lennyblazer


Posts: 1988
Joined: 5/6/2007
From: Appleton, WI / Houghton, MI
Status: offline
lennyblazer's photo gallery
Those are really expensive and do good, but mainly offroad. I would go with the BFG All Terrians if you do a majority of on road driving. Also the Goodyear MTR's would be a lot louder while driving just like the BFG MT's. Just our opinions though. Its your money so if you really like the look of either of the MT's and think you'll use them and that they would be worth the money go for it, but I would personally take the BFG AT's since they will last longer, do just as good, and will be a little more civil for on road driving.

-Lenny


_____________________________

-Lenny
4.3L Auto. 3.73Gears

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2358267

(in reply to sky96744)
Post #: 15
RE: MT or AT - 7/18/2007 9:03:34 PM   
a_tack


Suspension Tech Moderator
Posts: 1287
Joined: 4/5/2006
From: Ashland, Kentucky
Status: offline
a_tack's photo gallery
This is my buddy's Sierra...

he has the Goodyear Wrangler MTR, actually he is on his third set.... to make a long story short, this truck only has 45,000 miles on it.... 3 sets of MTR's.... it is his DD and he says the tires suck for on-road use and he can't keep it on the road in the rain, he keeps buying them becuase he thinks they look good and has extra $$ to throw around...lol

< Message edited by a_tack -- 7/18/2007 9:05:50 PM >


_____________________________

-Aaron

"Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath." -James 1:19

(in reply to lennyblazer)
Post #: 16
RE: MT or AT - 7/19/2007 3:38:42 PM   
blznlowxtreme


Posts: 1450
Joined: 3/20/2007
From: tennessee
Status: offline
blznlowxtreme's photo gallery
defiately would not have the mtr's they are really loud, they chop really hard when you turn at low speeds, and handling sucks, at 60+ mph your truck starts to sway all over the road.

_____________________________


2001 blazer xtreme
true bass 8's massive p1500.1 amp
20's wrapped in 245/35r20

(in reply to a_tack)
Post #: 17
RE: MT or AT - 7/24/2007 3:24:48 AM   
aris_unlimited

 

Posts: 231
Joined: 3/30/2006
Status: offline
aris_unlimited's photo gallery
I was actually looking at the General Grabber A/T's

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=General&tireModel=Grabber+AT+2&vehicleSearch=false&partnum=095SR5GRAT2OWL&fromCompare1=yes&place=8

I compared them to a lot of tires there and they are decently priced (cheaper then the others I was looking at), have a higher warranty, and they were rated fairly close together. Plus they have a slightly more aggressive tread pattern in my opinion.

< Message edited by aris_unlimited -- 7/24/2007 3:27:38 AM >


_____________________________

Cars: 2000 Chevy Blazer 4.3L 4WD LT, 2004 Nissan 350z 6speed.

(in reply to blznlowxtreme)
Post #: 18
RE: MT or AT - 7/24/2007 10:06:58 AM   
RCars2


Posts: 896
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Wisconsin originally but now im in Phx, AZ
Status: offline
RCars2's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: aris_unlimited

I was actually looking at the General Grabber A/T's

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=General&tireModel=Grabber+AT+2&vehicleSearch=false&partnum=095SR5GRAT2OWL&fromCompare1=yes&place=8

I compared them to a lot of tires there and they are decently priced (cheaper then the others I was looking at), have a higher warranty, and they were rated fairly close together. Plus they have a slightly more aggressive tread pattern in my opinion.



Those dont look too bad actually. Havent used these specific ones but General makes an ok tire. If ya get a set let us know how they turn out. Who knows, we might have a cheaper alternative to BFG AT's.

_____________________________

-Rob
"what fell off of where!?!?!"



Repair List:
Fender Rubbing Issue
Fuel Pump
Alignment
T-Case <--Fixed Finally

(in reply to aris_unlimited)
Post #: 19
RE: MT or AT - 7/24/2007 10:31:08 AM   
mdemers2006

 

Posts: 85
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
i suggest MT's....I live in Canada,Ottawa and trust me,we have a lot of crazy weater in winter(frezzing rain & snow).I am very happy with MT's.

_____________________________

As the old Chinese proverb says:When poo fall's down from the sky,the poor has no hat.

(in reply to RCars2)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
Blazer >> Modifications >> Tires and Wheels
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
swartlkk14499
drperry3901
hanr33482
chevy lover3411
m00nwater3269
eurogoldls3121
paddle_grl2944
hillbillyino2884
wolfpack2838
xblazer012659

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Add Blazer Forum to your favorites Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | About Us | Archive | Links | Link To Us | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Blazer Forum

Blazer Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.